Quentin tarantino dating history
Quentin tarantino dating history - Live cam chat pooping
During the furious “tantrumtino”, the Pulp Fiction director, who was in Britain for the premiere of his new violent spaghetti revenge drama last night, claimed he was not the news presenter’s “slave”, “master” or “monkey”.
He admitted that he would only answer questions from the journalist, who confessed to being a fan of the director’s work, to “sell” his Western film because “this is a commercial for the movie – make no mistake”.
The clearly flustered film maker, who became more heated as the interview progressed, further complained that his Oscar-nominated movie was “good cinema”, was “not real life” and was instead “fantasy”. The man behind other violent classics “Reservoir Dogs”, “Kill Bill” and “Inglorious Basterds” became enraged when asked why he is so adamant violence in movies was not to blame for real-life killings.
He denied there was a “relationship” with violence in movies to tragic events that occur in real life.
Clips of the interview, which were posted online, have sent social networks into meltdown as people discussed the astonishing diatribe.
His latest film, which features Tarantino's trademark style of extensive graphic and bloody violence, along with dark humour, was released just days after the Newtown school massacre, in which 20 children were killed in Connecticut.
Its world premiere was cancelled in the wake of the school shooting, which occurred just days earlier.
He has launched attacks on his critics who blame violence blockbusters such as his for the massacres, insisting such comments are disrespectful to the victims. “I don’t want to talk about what you want to talk about. The reason I don’t want to talk about it: because I’ve said everything I have to say about it.” He continued: “I have explained this many times in the last 20 years. Don’t ask me a question like that – I’m not biting.
Yesterday, Tarantino, who did not walk out of the interview, insisted he did not have to take “any responsibility to you to explain anything I don’t want to”. I don’t want to talk about the implications of violence. I just refuse to repeat myself over and over again because you want me to for you and your show. “I invite you to explore some serious themes but not things I’ve already been on the record talking about.” After the interview was aired last night, he told a visibly shocked co-presenter Jon Snow that his rear was “in tact”. You know, you watch a kung-fu movie and one guy takes on 100 people in a restaurant. KGM: But why are you so sure that there’s no link between enjoying movie violence and enjoying real violence?
Asked why he believed there is no link between movie violence and shooting massacres, he shouted: "It's none of your damn business what I think about that. I don't have any responsibility to you to explain anything I don't want to... Guru-Murthy, 42, later told The Daily Telegraph: “I was surprised about his reaction to the questions, which were very gentle.
"I've explained this many times in 20 years but I just refuse to repeat myself over and over again because you want me to - for you and your show and your ratings.” He added: “I’m going to tell you why I’m so sure? I love a lot of his work – I wasn't looking for a fight.
Don’t ask me a question like that – I’m not biting. “I would have thought if you invite somebody to interview you it is better to try to answer the questions rather than not. Then there’s the cathartic violence of Django paying back blood for blood.
“No interviewee has ever said "I'm not your slave... You sit there in a movie theatre when these cathartic, violent scenes happen… KGM: Is that why you think people like watching violent movies – people who are not violent people or twisted people in any way, but why it’s OK to go into a movie and enjoy the violence?